In the report ‘Who Killed MG Rover?’ authors Dr Matthias Holweg and Prof. Nick Oliver argue that by the time the
The report argues that MG Rover’s predecessor, the British Motor Corporation, had struggled to generate sufficient cash for new model development as early as the 1960s. By the early 1970s, though it was producing nearly a million cars a year, it was still unable to generate sufficient surplus funds to renew its range of models. This, they say, set the business on a downward path that successive changes of ownership were unable to reverse – although the partnership with Honda came perhaps closest to doing so.
The report adds that attempts to create a major British motor manufacturer through the consolidation of independent manufacturers such as
Also, once out of cash, the British Motor Corporation was dependent from the mid-1970s onwards on external resources for product development – these sources being first the
Honda was a partner to Rover for 15 years, and provided Rover with a number of successful new models throughout the 1980s and early 1990s. But the partnership ended abruptly when Rover’s then owner, British Aerospace, sold it to BMW in 1994. While Honda had represented a natural partner to Rover, the fit with BMW was never quite as good – though BMW pumped large amounts of cash into the company in an effort to revive its fortunes.
When BMW sold Rover to the Phoenix Group in 2000, the new owners were left with an ageing range of models but had no resources to develop new ones. Without a strong partner, a slow death was unavoidable, says the report.
The authors are sceptical that a deal with Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC) would have saved manufacturing at Longbridge. “SAIC did not want manufacturing capacity in
They conclude: “When
A full copy of the report can be found here.