Your questions answered: geoengineering
Our expert panel discusses the feasibility of using geoengineering techniques to counteract climate change
The world’s slow progress in cutting carbon-dioxide emissions has led some to call for research into ways we might counteract the effects of man-made climate change. Such attempts to geoengineer our climate range include planting trees to absorb CO2; pumping sulphate aerosols into the atmosphere; and building giant orbiting space mirrors to reflect heat back into space.
We put your questions on these proposals for geoengineering to a panel of experts:
What do you see as the pros and cons of the different geoengineering techniques that have been proposed?
Richard Darton: Geoengineering comes in two main flavours: a variety of schemes known as Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR), in which the most prevalent greenhouse gas is taken out of the atmosphere into safe storage; and Solar Radiation Management (SRM), which reflects sunshine back into space, to avoid it heating the Earth’s surface.
Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) would be needed at massive scale in order to have any effect and this would take many decades
Register now to continue reading
Thanks for visiting The Engineer. You’ve now reached your monthly limit of premium content. Register for free to unlock unlimited access to all of our premium content, as well as the latest technology news, industry opinion and special reports.
Benefits of registering
-
In-depth insights and coverage of key emerging trends
-
Unrestricted access to special reports throughout the year
-
Daily technology news delivered straight to your inbox
Comment: The UK is closer to deindustrialisation than reindustrialisation
"..have been years in the making" and are embedded in the actors - thus making it difficult for UK industry to move on and develop and apply...