Britain will use data science and artificial intelligence to transform the prevention, early diagnosis and treatment of diseases like cancer, diabetes, heart disease and dementia by 2030.
This ambition is one of four addressed in a speech delivered at Jodrell Bank, Cheshire on May 21, 2018 in which prime minister Theresa May outlined new missions as part of the government’s Industrial Strategy.
These include the production of zero-emission cars and vans by 2040, drastically reducing energy use in new buildings by 2030, and the development of ‘well-designed products and services’ to help people age healthily.
“As a government, we have set the goal of research and development investment reaching 2.4 per cent of GDP by 2027,” said May. “That could translate to an additional £80bn investment in the ideas of the future over the next decade.”
May outlined how government intends to incubate ‘a whole new industry around AI-in-healthcare’, and work with industry to help ‘set global standards for managing technological change to maximise the benefits’ of zero-emission vehicles.
The mission to halve energy use in new commercial and residential buildings is similarly expected to provide the catalyst for new technologies, which can be exported to a growing global market for clean technologies.
“In each one of these four missions, scientific and technological innovations have the potential to create jobs, drive economic growth across the country and deliver tangible improvements for everyone in our country,” said May.
The PM also used her speech to acknowledge the value of EU programme collaborations and the government’s ambition to achieve a deep research and innovation partnership with the EU.
Responding to the speech, Prof Sir Robert Lechler PMedSci, president of the Academy of Medical Sciences said: “The prime minister is absolutely right to place science and research at the heart of the government’s Industrial Strategy. The excellence of the UK’s research is well known and continues to provide the solutions to help us address the challenges our society faces today and in the future.”
Sounding a note of caution, Prof Lord Martin Rees, Emeritus Professor of Cosmology and Astrophysics at Cambridge University said: “These are fine aspirations. But they will remain empty words unless the country has, by the 2020s, a very different government with a commitment to the public sector and a realistic programme for achieving such ambitious goals.”
>“As a government, we have set the goal of research and development investment reaching 2.4 per cent of GDP by 2027,” said May. “>>
2.4% is a low target. Given how underfunded it has been historically, they should have aimed for no less than 4%, ideally 5%.
Given the woefully small number of technically qualified people in parliament and none in the cabinet, she must mean “political-science”. Consecutive governments have relied on pressure groups and vested-interest-quangoes for their advice to the great detriment of the UK.
Sadly, technically qualified people have proved unwilling to stand for parliament: the old-boy network still rules supreme.
I believe our illustrious Journal and its Editor should blow a loud raspberry every time a politician of any stripe says ‘Science’ without adding ‘Engineering!!’
Great scientists and engineers only grow from great teachers, great learning cultures and appropriate learning environments – I feel in most cases we’re failing to deliver these fundamental things.
“These are fine aspirations, but they’ll remain empty words unless the country has, by the 2020s, a very different government with a commitment to the public sector and a realistic programme for achieving such ambitious goals.” – Spot on, Prof Lord Martin Rees.
27 Feb. 2018 – InterGen announced today the financial close of credit facilities for its 300-megawatt OCGT natural gas-fired Spalding Energy Expansion project. (‘back-up’ generation!!)
The £100 million project has a 15-year agreement following a successful bid in the Government’s December 2016 capacity auction. The project is the first and, to date, only large scale, thermal project to secure limited recourse financing based on the 15-year capacity agreement.
So, the dash-for-gas and the Capacity Market are both abysmal failures? What price new energy storage? Shucks, the government has rigged the ‘market’ to stop it being developed:-
“It’s a bit like a carousel,” he said. “I asked the generators if they would be willing to build storage capacity, and they don’t think it’s their responsibility; they think it’s a network function. And if you ask the network operators, they say that government regulations say that they are not allowed to own generating capacity and storage, ironically, is classified as generating capacity; but if someone were to offer it as a contract service, such as a demand aggregator, they’d be happy to pay for it. I spoke to them, and they said they’d be happy to offer the service, but they aren’t in the business of investing in capital-intensive equipment and the intermittency wasn’t their problem, so why didn’t I talk to the generators?
The project has signed a contract with Siemens for an F-class gas turbine. Construction is expected to be completed in June 2019. InterGen is jointly owned by the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan and China Huaneng Group/Guangdong Yudean Group.
UK windpower is dominated by foreign companies. UK nuclear is owned and run by foreign state-owned corporations. UK innovation (energy storage) in engineering will only become mainstream, if these companies decide it is in their commercial interests. The ‘winners’ that emerge from public investment in R&D will be almost exclusively foreign-owned. Why do we give our IP away? More importantly, why do we stymie radical innovation, which can beat the global competition?