A lightweight metal that reduces fuel use in cars and planes could be extracted from the ocean through a process being developed at the US Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
The process could ultimately make fuel-efficient transportation more affordable and expand the American magnesium market.
PNNL is leading a $2.7m, three-year project to develop a novel method that removes naturally occurring magnesium from seawater. The project was by DOE’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E).
‘Demand for lightweight metals such as magnesium is growing, but it’s expensive and energy-intensive to produce them,’ said the project’s lead researcher, PNNL Laboratory Fellow Pete McGrail. ‘We expect our method will be 50 per cent more energy efficient than the United States’ current magnesium production process. This will also decrease carbon emissions and the cost.’
Magnesium is used in alloys that decrease weight and increase strength of parts used in vehicles, airplanes, power generation equipment, industrial processes and buildings. It is, however, about seven times more expensive to produce than the steel traditionally used in those applications. Furthermore, producing lightweight metals also requires a lot of energy.
A cheaper and more efficient production process is needed to enable the broader use of lightweight metals, leading ARPA-E to announce $32m in funding for new projects that will develop new processing and recycling methods.
The United States is home to just one bulk magnesium plant in Utah, where brine from the Great Salt Lake region is put through electrolysis to extract the metal from a molten salt. About a third of the nation’s magnesium is imported, and China is the world’s largest producer.
‘Reinventing the magnesium production process so it’s more affordable can also help grow the American magnesium market and decrease U.S. reliance on foreign-made materials,’ McGrail said in a statement.
PNNL says it is developing a new, titanium-based catalyst that regenerates an important chemical used in the magnesium extraction process. The catalyst will enable a more efficient process and use less energy as the process will require temperatures of no more than 300 degrees Celsius, considerably lower than the 900 degrees Celsius required by the current U.S. process.
PNNL will draw on its expertise in catalyst development, molecular simulation, powder metallurgy and metal-organic chemistry for the project. Detailed computer modeling and follow-up lab tests will be used to pinpoint the catalyst’s specific chemical makeup.
The project team plans to develop a prototype system that uses the new process. Commercial-scale magnesium production with the new process is expected to halve the current US production cost. It should cost less than $1.50 and require only 25 kilowatt-hours of energy per kilogram.
PNNL is partnering with Global Seawater Extraction Technologies and Utah magnesium plant owner U.S. Magnesium, LLC. The new production method will use a crystallization process developed by Global Seawater Extraction Technologies and tap electrolysis and practical magnesium production experience from US Magnesium.
ARPA-E is providing $2.4m for the project, while PNNL’s project partners will provide the following cost-share matching: $210,000 from Global Seawater Extraction Technologies and $60,000 from U.S. Magnesium.
PNNL’s project team includes Pete McGrail and his fellow researchers Satish Nune, Phillip Koech, Vassiliki-Alexandra Glezakou, Radha Motkuri, Carlos Fernandez, Sudhir Ramprasad and Leo Fifield.
This is a fantastic “two for the price of one technology” – this company are claiming to be able to generate energy as well as a byproduct of the desalination but that is presumably from waste process heat rather than any the use of any chemical energy latent in seawater?
Great concept and I hope it works: BUT…
it sounds like the process/technology/concept that various German researchers were trying to develop to pay for the reparations demanded by the Allies after World War One! Extracting gold from seawater. They never did get enough gold at anything like the cost in energy expenditure that would have made it profitable, BUT the research did go a long way to assist in the development of a whole series of electro-chemical efforts. There was a spin-off!
That outstanding researcher S. Eren Dipidity, who I believe used to tell colleagues that the most important research tool they would ever have was the Mark I human eyeball, would I am sure approve.
Best
Mike b
“it sounds like the process/technology/concept that various German researchers were trying to develop to pay for the reparations demanded by the Allies after World War One! Extracting gold from seawater.” BUT…
Magnesium exists in sea water at a concentration over 7 million times that of gold!